Abstract
The effect of pipe-insert thickness on turbulent pipe flow response and recovery is numerically investigated at a Reynolds number of 25, 000. Three perturbation thicknesses are assessed, referred to as Fourier pipe-inserts, , and 0.15D. The relationship between insert thickness and recovery of turbulent kinetic energy and mean axial velocity is assessed to evaluate the impact of perturbation thickness. Increasing the perturbation strength (thickness) enhances flow turbulence due to increased geometric contraction. Excess turbulence is transported away from the wall, following an empirical power law that scales with h. Global parameters, such as skin friction and pressure loss, are analyzed for future design considerations. All cases demonstrate a localized skin-friction reduction that returns to equilibrium at varying distances downstream. The thickest perturbation () has the largest skin-friction reduction and exhibits the largest pressure gradient within the pipe-insert, with an overall increase in pressure loss by 3.1%. These results demonstrate that insert thickness is a critical design parameter for Fourier pipe-inserts with significant implications for flow recovery and drag reduction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Acknowledgements
This study has received support from Alberta Innovates. Digital Research Alliance of Canada clusters were implemented for the required computational analysis.
Funding
This work received leveraged funding from NSERC and Alberta Innovates, based on sponsored funding from Green Energy and Environmental Solutions Inc. (GEES Energy).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dincoglu, Y., Verma, S. & Hemmati, A. Effect of targeted wall shape thickness on flow response and recovery for engineering design. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-58266-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-58266-8